Sunday, 4 October 2015

Contenders get Cleave-d in historic Ngaio Marsh victory

Paul Cleave became the Crown Prince of antipodean crime writing when his thriller FIVE MINUTES ALONE was named the winner of the 2015 Ngaio Marsh Award for Best Crime Novel on Sunday night.

The internationally bestselling author made history when his “gritty and thoroughly absorbing” novel that “evokes complex feelings about retribution and morality” was revealed as the winner before a packed hometown crowd at a lively WORD Christchurch event at the Court Theatre on 4 October. 

In a year with a remarkable quintet of finalists, it’s fitting that Paul Cleave has become the first author to win the Ngaio Marsh Award twice,” said Judging Convenor Craig Sisterson. “For almost a decade he’s been leading our vanguard on the world stage in what’s becoming a new heyday of local crime writing.”

In FIVE MINUTES ALONE, “wonderfully complex protagonist” Theo Tate has been resurrected, as a cop and human being, after recovering from a coma. He finds himself chasing a killer he can empathise with: a vigilante who is disposing of society’s worst offenders, giving victims of crime their ‘five minutes alone’ with the culprits. But settling old scores is never as simple as it seems, as Tate knows well himself.

The judging panel, consisting of crime fiction experts – authors, critics, and editors – from Scandinavia, the United States, Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand, said FIVE MINUTES ALONE was packed with “moral dilemmas, and great writing, pacing, and characters,” and demanded to be read in one sitting. “The characters are sympathetic and human, never becoming black and white or easily classified as good or bad,” noted one judge. “Cleave’s prose crackles like a campfire, darkly hypnotic and dangerous.

Cleave had previously won the Ngaio Marsh Award in 2011 for BLOOD MEN.  The Award is made annually for the best crime, mystery, or thriller novel written by a New Zealand citizen or resident. Cleave also received a set of Dame Ngaio’s novels courtesy of her publisher HarperCollins, a cash prize provided by WORD Christchurch, and an invite to appear at a European crime writing festival.

For more information on the Ngaio Marsh Award, go to  or email, or to contact the Judging Convenor directly:  

Friday, 2 October 2015

Heroes and villains by Rob Sinclair

Today’s guest blog is by Rob Sinclair author of the Enemy series of espionage thrillers featuring embattled agent Carl Logan.

I’m writing this blog immediately after watching one of my favourite movies; Batman Begins. Whilst watching the film, it got me thinking about just what it is that makes a character in a story, whether in a book or on film, a hero? And has our perception of what makes a hero always been the same or is it changing?

A hero is defined as someone who is admired for their courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities. But the more I thought about the question, the more I began to doubt that definition. It just seems to me to be ... a bit too vanilla. Heroes are good people. They strive for justice, show tremendous courage ... yeah, yeah, I get all that. There are many heroes in real life and in fiction who are exactly that; think army heroes, or people who save others from burning buildings. People who for whatever reason care for or try to save others and in doing so put themselves in harms way. These are all heroes.

But the fact is, a hero who is all good, who has high morals in everything he or she does and who never puts a foot wrong, never once crosses the line of rules and regulations and laws, can be quite boring in a fictional world I think. When I list out my favourite fictional characters, they all carry something else about them too. A dark side. You see, to some extent I want my heroes to be bad - and I don’t think I’m alone.

It’s no accident that virtually all heroes of comics and in crime and thriller fiction have a dark side to them, an edge that makes them more interesting, but actually completely goes against the definition of what a hero is. Take Jack Reacher for example, or Jason Bourne or James Bond. Three very well known action heroes, but really the list goes on and on. Each one is considered a good guy, we follow them, we believe in them and their judgment, but each one carries out acts that in real life many people would be appalled by. All readily assault people, for example. All are killers. Granted, we know they only do that to the “bad guys”, of course, but there’s no room for such vigilantism in the real world, is there? Bad guys get arrested, they go to court and to prison - those are the rules that we live by. But much of the time I don’t want that when I’m reading a book or watching a movie. I want the bad guy to get his comeuppance, there and then. Because I know damn well that he’s bad, the writer already told me so. There’s no need for legal process.

I wondered whether this picture of a more troubled hero might just be my preference, or even a generational view; It’s notable for example that many classic comic book heroes have been the subject of movie reboots over the past decade where the lead character is much darker, drier and angrier; there’s Batman, Superman, Spiderman, Wolverine to name but a few. Not to mention the emergence of other fictional characters of even more dubious morality such as Lisbeth Salander in Stieg Larsson’s Millennium Trilogy. There are many characters who are not necessarily nice people, but we route for them all the same. The lead character in my Enemy series, Carl Logan, is much the same. It was my Dad who first got me thinking about this when he read an early draft of my second book, Rise of the Enemy. He asked me whether I wanted readers to like Logan. The answer was yes, of course! It seemed so obvious to me, because I really like him. But my Dad questioned that, and suggested that maybe not everyone would think so - Logan, after all, kills more than one person in cold blood in the stories, when he certainly had the option not to. I actually toned down one of two of the action scenes in later edits. Yet the more I thought about this point of what makes a hero, the more I delved into heroes from the past, warriors and heretics and revolutionaries from bygone eras, I kept coming back to the same view: Yes, heroes are undoubtedly noble and courageous, as per the definition. But in many, many cases, they are also ruthless and brutal.

So why is that? The only answer I can give is that it’s basic human nature to empathise and
idolise people with those qualities for the very fact that we could never ourselves act like they do. We’ve all thought and dreamt about punishing people who have wronged us, or wished bad things to happen to horrible people we’ve heard about in the press - terrorists and murderers and the like - even though we’ve never met them. It’s a human emotion borne from our need to keep order in society by achieving retribution against those who have passed outside our own moral compass. Or something like that. It’s a type of hero that has always been around in folklore and in fiction and that I think always will be.

What makes a hero? Well, the dictionary definition hits the spot in many respects, but I like my heroes to have a little extra too. I like my heroes like I like my coffee: strong, dark and bitter, but with a warmth that hits you deep inside.

More information about Rob Sinclair can be found on his website.  You can also follow him on Twitter  
@RSinclairAuthor and find him on Facebook.

Rise of the Enemy by Rob Sinclair is out now (Clink Street Publishing, £14.99)

Everyone has a breaking point. Carl Logan might just have found his. The Joint Intelligence Agency sends agent Carl Logan on a routine mission to Russia. It should have been simple. But when Logan's cover is blown, he's transported into a world of hell he thought he would never see again. Something is different this time, though, and before long doubts begin to surface in Logan's mind as to why the assignment went so wrong. Logan has never been short of enemies. And sometimes the enemy is closer to home than you think. Could his own people really have set him up?